Based on feedback from other bloggers, I'll stop posting any entries focusing on ARMY SEX (what a waste). Anyway, I've noticed something about the No. 3 uniform in general and would like to post my observations (strictly from a girl who has never served NS but has dated (and lusted after) many men in uniform).
It appears that the No. 3 uniform looks the worst on NSFs. They are baggy and way too loose. The shirts are oversized and the pants are very baggy. Worse, they like to wear their pants really low on their hips. Yucks. Nothing for girls like me and Merenwen to ogle at. Maybe it's because NSFs wearing No. 3 are usually the non-combat fit ones (probably clerks?) - according to my boyfriend.
On regulars, the No. 3 uniform looks not bad. They tend to be more fitter and more seasoned - leading to the "thin fabric" shirt syndrome that I love so much. Plus they have all those extra badges or whatever that make the uniform look even smarter! Cool.
But the No. 3 uniform looks best on Warrant Officers. I have met two of them through my boyfriends (current and ex) - one Chinese and one Malay. On them, the No. 3 looks really solid. The shirts are very very tight and the pants are also very fitted. I also noticed that WOs (esp the Malay Encik) like to wear the No. 3 pants high waisted - and because of that - it makes their butts look more perky and curvy somehow. The only drawback is that sometimes that can lead to "camel toes". But all the better for girls to stare.
Anyway, I've tried to get my current boyfriend (who's usually in camous) to wear his No. 3 like the WOs but he refuses. Says that tight No. 3 shirts are uncomfortable and wearing the pants high-waisted will make him look ridiculous. Drats.
Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe it's because I only have limited exposure to guys wearing No. 3. Could the rest of the more experienced bloggers clarify? Thanks!